1978. Choose an implausible or strikingly unrealistic incident or character in a work of fiction or drama of recognized literary merit. Write an essay that explains how the incident or character is related to the more realistic of plausible elements in the rest of the work. Avoid plot summary
The addition of an utterly bizarre incident in a play or novel strikes readers and elicits a comparison between the fiction and their life. In Edward Albee’s The American Dream, Mommy and Daddy’s treatment of Baby is incredibly bizarre and unrealistic, this incident however is tied to realistic elements of the story. Becoming heavily responsible for the creation of meaning, illustrating what not to do and where Albee thought the current society was going.
The addition of an utterly bizarre incident in a play or novel strikes readers and elicits a comparison between the fiction and their life. In Edward Albee’s The American Dream, Mommy and Daddy’s treatment of Baby is incredibly bizarre and unrealistic, this incident however is tied to realistic elements of the story. Becoming heavily responsible for the creation of meaning, illustrating what not to do and where Albee thought the current society was going.
Many aspects of the play would strike the reader as normal. These are most
important because they allow readers to relate the play to their own lives.
Starting with Mommy and Daddy, Albee paints them to be obviously distant and
estranged. This relationship is clearly seen in Mommy’s domineering language
towards Daddy. As well his genuine lack of interest and sentiment towards her. Details
such as them no longer sleeping together, their consumption of pop show how
dependent both are to society and the ramifications. This is seen first with
Mommy during the hat fiasco and even more through the fact that they are in an
assortment of clubs showing their need to belong. Knowing their other
characteristics: needing to appear rich, wanting to have a family—seen in them
calling each other Mommy and Daddy sans the presence of a child—and having to
have the right hat, these all begin to form shows a couple who prizes
materialism, outward appearances, and ultimately themselves before any others.
These are all things that we see everyday even now; it’s the new american
culture.
Mommy and Daddy’s dissatisfaction is understandable when looking at their
character make-up. Mommy is the biggest offender and bigger villain, neither of
them are innocent, especially in the act against the baby. The mutilation of
the baby is the bizarre act. Though it first hits us as strange through further
reflection and examination of the characters and morals of both Mommy and Daddy
it no longer seems so unrealistic. The reason for the mutilation was what Mommy
saw as wrong doing towards her, “[the baby} had eyes only for his father,”
something that is rare. Babies have eyes for their mothers which molded society
to expect that the baby would prefer the mother. Because the baby went against
society’s norms and in doing so embarrassed her she punished him, by ordering
Daddy to mutilate the child and emasculate him.
The technique of linking the normal with the bizarre makes for a well relatable
play; one that will enable audiences to learn from it. This was indeed Albee’s
purpose in writing the America Dream. By pointing out the normal elements
of the play in our everyday world such as the obsession with materialism,
estranged couples that no longer love each other, and the valuing of a group acceptance
it makes it easier to relate the bizarre to our lives as well. The ordinary
elements of the play lead to the unrealistic act that caused tragedy, so by not
living our lives in that way we can ourselves avoid that tragedy and
dissatisfaction.
I don't completely understand your opener. I think there was a problem when you redid the essay, because there are several fragments and run-on sentences. You do try to show how the mutilation creates meaning, but you don't really show "what not to do" other than using common sense.
ReplyDeleteIn your first paragraph, you say that most of the play is normal, but then talk about several abnormal features of the Characters.
As an absurdist play, I think that we are meant to see the character's as completely abnormal.
I think your second paragraph is good. you make it clear what you are trying to prove, and you succeed in proving that.
You answer your own thesis in your essay, but I don't think you answer the prompt.
You've got a great closing that ties everything up, but you're first paragraph is a big confusing. You seem to be listing off the normal actions that Mommy and Daddy exhibit but it all seems to be a bit jumbled together, maybe some reformatting would help.
ReplyDeleteMake sure your introductory sentences are a road map for everything you'll be talking about in that paragraph, the first one is good, but you're second one seems to be lacking. You're going to show how their mutilation of the Baby is related to their normalness, so instead of saying that their "dissatisfaction" you should be saying their "mutilation of the child can be understood because...".
Otherwise you seem to answer your thesis and for the most part provide remarks on who the realistic is related to the unrealistic. Nice job!